ASICS GEL-EXCITE 11 for men: Review, price and fit

The ASICS GEL-EXCITE 11 men’s running shoes are designed for easy road runs and for runners looking for a versatile pair they can also wear at the gym. The midsole combines AMPLIFOAM PLUS foam with GEL in the heel, while the upper uses jacquard mesh.

This is a neutral running shoe, better suited to comfortable mileage than racing or chasing a fast response. Laboratory measurements show a substantial amount of material beneath the heel and foam that is firmer than average: two important details when considering whether a cushioned shoe will feel soft.

Price and place in the range

The model has been sold with a reference price of around €90, although lower prices have also been advertised depending on the retailer, size and colour. This is a guide rather than a current offer: the final price can change, and delivery costs matter when comparing options.

Its design and price put it among accessible training shoes, without a carbon plate or a race-focused construction. It makes the most sense for someone looking for one pair for easy runs and general activity, rather than a runner who already owns several specialist shoes.

Cushioning: What the foam and GEL do

The AMPLIFOAM PLUS midsole forms the main cushioning layer. GEL sits at the rear and complements the foam in the area where many runners first make contact with the ground. An OrthoLite insole adds a layer of underfoot comfort and helps manage moisture.

Laboratory measurements showed a stack height of 38.2 mm at the heel and 27.4 mm at the forefoot, compared with averages of 35.6 and 27.2 mm respectively. The most noticeable difference is therefore at the rear; height alone does not determine how soft or protective a shoe will feel to an individual runner.

Midsole hardness measured 40.5 AC, against an average of 35.4 AC. On that scale, the result points to firmer foam than the average of the shoes measured. For runners who prefer a very plush feel, that is a useful detail that the technology name alone cannot convey.

Forefoot energy return was 49.1% in laboratory testing, compared with an average of 61.5%. This measures energy returned under test conditions; it does not translate directly into a gain or loss of running speed. It does suggest that foam responsiveness is not the shoe’s strongest argument against models designed for faster efforts.

Drop and weight: How they affect the choice

Drop is the difference in height between the heel and forefoot. Laboratory measurements produced a figure of 10.8 mm, calculated from the measured stack heights, while some retail specifications list 8 mm. The numbers are not identical, but both describe a shoe with the heel raised above the front.

This kind of drop may feel familiar to runners who already wear traditional shoes with more height at the rear. It does not force a heel strike or correct running form on its own. Anyone coming from a much lower-drop shoe should take the change in geometry into account when introducing the new pair.

The published weight for the men’s version is 290 grams; the laboratory measurement was 286 grams, compared with an average of 261 grams. This helps place it among training shoes, but is not an identical figure for every size. Runners prioritising a very light shoe for intervals or racing will find a different emphasis here.

Fit and sizing: Room where it matters

The jacquard mesh upper is designed to adapt around the foot without relying on numerous overlays. Padding around the collar and tongue adds comfort at the ankle and beneath the laces, while the final fit also depends on foot shape and how the shoe is laced.

The measured width at the front was 71.2 mm, compared with a 73.2 mm average. That figure does not describe the entire fit on its own, but it adds useful context: an apparently roomy upper does not ensure enough space around the toes, especially for wide feet or a forefoot that spreads while running.

Size deserves particular attention when buying online. Foot-length conversions can help with comparisons, but they cannot replace trying the shoes on: check for room around the toes, a secure heel and no pressure at the sides while wearing your usual socks. A clear exchange policy is particularly valuable when choosing between two sizes.

In the breathability test, the model scored 2 points against an average of 3.6. A mesh upper does not automatically mean high ventilation; the result is worth considering in warm weather, especially for runners whose feet tend to feel hot or damp inside their shoes.

Who and what it suits

The GEL-EXCITE 11 fits the profile of a beginner or regular runner heading out at comfortable paces on roads. It can also work for walking or combining running with gym exercise, provided the activity does not demand the specific lateral support of a training shoe.

One suggested usage pattern is two to four runs a week of around 45 minutes. That is not a technical limit: suitable mileage and duration depend on the runner’s conditioning. For longer distances, the question is not simply whether the shoe can complete the session, but whether it remains comfortable as time on feet and fatigue increase.

Its neutral construction can suit runners with a neutral or supinated gait. Pronation itself is a normal movement and does not automatically make a neutral shoe unsuitable. Persistent pain or a recommendation for specific support should be assessed by a health professional rather than addressed solely by changing shoes.

Body weight does not create a universal boundary for use either. Rather than applying a fixed weight range, consider comfort, weekly volume and wear. A runner covering high mileage may prefer an alternative with more cushioning or support if this pair stops feeling comfortable on longer runs.

Outsole, grip and wear

The FLUIDRIDE outsole includes rubber in contact and wear areas and is primarily intended for urban surfaces. Its layout suits pavements and roads; it is not a lugged outsole designed for mud, loose rock or technical descents.

In the outsole durability test, measured wear was 0.9 mm, compared with a 1.1 mm average. That is a favourable result under those test conditions, but it cannot be converted into a precise lifespan: terrain, running style and frequency all affect real-world wear.

Visible rubber is not the only part that ages. The midsole also accumulates load, so a shoe can change underfoot before holes appear in the outsole. Uneven wear, reduced comfort or deformation are reasons to assess the pair’s condition, rather than relying on a universal mileage figure.

A versatile shoe versus a specialist model

The main advantage of this design is that it combines a road-running construction with straightforward everyday use. That versatility involves trade-offs: it does not offer the weight or response typically sought for racing, and its outsole is no substitute for a trail shoe.

For heavy strength work or intense lateral movements, a dedicated training shoe may provide a more suitable base than a high-stack running midsole. For a short run followed by general exercise, however, the GEL-EXCITE 11 can reduce the amount of equipment needed, provided the fit and comfort work for the wearer.

The decision ultimately depends less on a beginner label than on actual use: a compatible fit and comfortable cushioning matter more than a long list of technologies. Comparing the firmness, ventilation and forefoot measurements helps bring those factors into focus before buying.

How we put this review together: we have not tested these shoes. We wrote it by reading published lab tests, brand information and runners’ opinions.

Este artículo contiene enlaces de afiliado: si compras a través de ellos, se genera una pequeña comisión sin coste adicional para ti. Más información.