Salomon Ultra Glide 3 for women: review and price

The Salomon Ultra Glide 3 for women is a trail running shoe with generous cushioning and a long-distance focus. Its design favours forest tracks, firm trails and mixed routes where comfort over several hours matters more than a fast response or a mud-specific outsole.

Its specifications include a 41 mm heel height, a 6 mm drop and 4 mm lugs. The reference price is €150, and the women’s version weighs around 255 grams per shoe. It is an option for mountain training and racing, with limitations on very technical or muddy terrain.

Technical specifications: what the numbers mean

The platform measures 41 mm at the heel and 35 mm at the forefoot. The difference is the 6 mm drop, a measurement that describes the shoe’s geometry rather than instructing a runner how to land. The amount of foam places the model among high-stack trail shoes.

The women’s version has a stated approximate weight of 255 grams per shoe, based on a pair in a medium size. The men’s version is listed at around 285 grams per shoe; the figures depend on the size used and do not, on their own, allow a comparison of the fit of the two versions.

The construction combines an Energy Foam midsole, an All Terrain Contagrip outsole, engineered mesh, a Quicklace closure and an OrthoLite insole. The version described has no waterproof membrane. Its components share a priority: cushioning and support over prolonged routes without resorting to very deep lugs.

Cushioning and stability on trails

The Energy Foam midsole combines EVA with an olefin copolymer. Its purpose is to provide a cushioned surface underfoot, which can be useful on hard tracks or long outings. The curved platform supports the transition through the stride, although it does not make the shoe an explosive racing option.

The Relieve Sphere geometry underneath uses wave-like shapes intended to distribute pressure more evenly. This is a design feature, not a guarantee that a runner will finish less fatigued or avoid injury. Training and terrain also shape the demands of each outing.

The wide base provides support, but the height places more material between the foot and the ground. That may be comfortable on an easy trail; on a loose, rocky descent, a runner who prefers to feel every foothold might miss a lower shoe. Stability is not the same as gait correction: for recurring pain or prescribed insoles, assessment belongs with the professional familiar with the individual case.

Contagrip outsole: where it makes the most sense

All Terrain Contagrip rubber and 4 mm lugs aim to balance performance across varied surfaces. The lug depth suits combinations of forest tracks, firm dirt and dry trails without requiring a mud-specific tread. It also allows for walking sections on a route that alternates running and hiking.

In deep mud, the lugs have less ability to penetrate the ground than an outsole designed specifically for those conditions. On wet rock and roots, grip can change abruptly: choosing a foothold matters more than the promise of an all-terrain outsole.

Short road connections are possible, but tarmac wears down trail tread and is not the model’s main surface. A route leaving a Valencian town and continuing onto dry mountain tracks fits its design better than a training run made up almost entirely of pavements.

Fit, sizing and water protection

The upper uses engineered mesh and an internal EndoFit sleeve, designed to wrap around the foot. The collar and tongue are padded, the toe has a reinforcement, and the Quicklace system lets the wearer tighten the laces in one pull. Excess lace can be stored in a pocket on the tongue.

The women’s version is marketed to women, but that label alone does not determine whether its shape will suit every foot. What matters is that the heel stays secure and the toes have room, including when simulating a descent. Tightening the closure cannot fix the wrong size and can create pressure across the top of the foot.

To choose a size, measure foot length while standing on a flat surface and compare it with Salomon’s official sizing chart. Trying the shoes with usual running socks and any personal insoles is more useful: both change the available interior space. For an online purchase, exchange and return conditions are also part of the decision.

The mesh supports airflow, but the padding adds material around the foot and does not guarantee a particular sensation of coolness. Without a membrane, water can enter through puddles, wet grass or heavy rain; anyone who prioritises that protection needs to consider a different construction.

Which runner and distance is it suited to?

The Ultra Glide 3 can be used for easy runs as well as long races or ultras. There is no minimum distance needed to benefit from its cushioning: a one-hour run on a track also fits. For racing, the course profile matters more than the kilometre count when deciding whether the outsole and platform are suitable.

A runner new to trails might consider the model if she wants cushioning for straightforward paths. A regular trail runner could use it for long training runs. For fast intervals, tight turns or precise foot placement, however, a lighter, lower-to-the-ground shoe may be more appropriate.

Body weight affects how foam feels, but there is no universal weight limit that determines whether the shoe is suitable. Fit, individual stability needs and the type of route also matter. Comfort when trying it with usual gear is more useful than choosing or dismissing the model based on one figure.

Price and comparison with the previous generation

The reference price of the Salomon Ultra Glide 3 for women is €150. The selling price can vary by size, colour and retailer. When comparing an offer, shipping costs and the option to return the pair matter, particularly if the shoes have not been tried on beforehand.

Compared with the Ultra Glide 2, this third generation has a more substantial platform and redesigned underfoot geometry. The construction change does not mean every runner will prefer the new version: someone familiar with the earlier fit may notice differences in height, interior space or the way the shoe feels underfoot.

Within trail running, the alternative depends on the ground. A model with deeper lugs may be preferable for persistent mud; a lower-profile shoe may suit someone who prioritises precision. On a mixed course, it is worth considering the sections that define the route’s demands, not just the most comfortable kilometres.

Durability and signs that shoes need replacing

There is no universal mileage that marks the end of a shoe’s useful life. Rock, tarmac, frequency of use and running style all affect wear. It is more practical to assess the outsole, midsole and fit together than to replace a pair simply because it has reached a fixed distance.

Rounded lugs can lose traction, especially when braking downhill. A tear in the fabric, a heel that no longer holds securely or uneven deformation of the foam can also change the support. Surface creases alone do not prove that cushioning has stopped working; a persistent change in support alongside visible wear is a more useful signal.

Terrain matters more than the ultra label

Ultradistance covers very different courses: a race dominated by dry tracks demands different things from one with ravines, wet rock or mud. The shoe’s name is no substitute for reading the route. Footwear choice starts with the actual surface and the time spent on it.

In the Valencian Community, a single outing can link streets, farm tracks and mountain trails. Identifying the sections with the trickiest descents or least predictable footholds helps a runner judge the outsole required and understand when a shoe designed for prolonged comfort is appropriate.

Este artículo contiene enlaces de afiliado: si compras a través de ellos, se genera una pequeña comisión sin coste adicional para ti. Más información.