Reviews and Comparisons
Hoka Mafate 5 for women: price, weight and trail review
A long-distance trail shoe with a Vibram outsole, generous cushioning and a few details worth weighing before buying.

The Hoka Mafate 5 for women is a trail running shoe designed for long distances and varied mountain routes. It combines a dual-density midsole, a Vibram Megagrip outsole and 5 mm lugs in a construction that puts protection ahead of extreme lightness.
The women’s version weighs approximately 286 grams per shoe, has an 8 mm drop and launched at around €190. It is particularly suited to long training runs, mountain marathons and ultras, although its bulk and structure may be more than runners need on easy tracks or when looking for a very light shoe.
Specifications and women’s and men’s differences
The reference weight for the women’s version is equivalent to 572 grams per pair. The men’s version is listed at around 332 grams per shoe. That difference needs context: the weights are taken in different reference sizes and change with the size selected.
Both versions share the same mountain focus, outsole compound and stated 8 mm drop. The women’s model is listed with a 43 mm heel height, while the men’s specifications give 45 mm at the heel and 37 mm at the forefoot. Stack height describes the material beneath the foot; drop is the difference in height between those two areas.
Published laboratory tests on a men’s sample recorded 42.9 mm at the heel and 33.9 mm at the forefoot, with a measured drop of 9 mm. Those figures cannot be applied directly to the women’s model and may vary with shoe size and measurement method.
Cushioning and geometry for long miles
The midsole combines two densities of EVA: an upper layer of supercritical foam and a lower layer of compression-moulded EVA. The first is intended to provide cushioning and response, while the second contributes structural support. The construction is designed for the demands of a long day, not as a promise to eliminate fatigue.
The curved geometry, called Rocker Integrity, is designed to guide the transition from landing to toe-off. A support element at the front helps preserve the shape of the shoe and adds protection beneath the forefoot. It is not a carbon plate designed to propel the stride like those found in some road racing shoes.
In the laboratory, the men’s sample recorded 160 SA for heel impact absorption, compared with an average of 122 SA, and 63.1% forefoot energy return, against an average of 59.8%. These measurements help place the materials in context under test conditions; they do not directly predict how much energy an individual runner will save.
The structure also comes with a trade-off in freedom of movement: the bending test recorded 17.1 N against an average of 14.9 N. Runners who prefer a shoe that bends easily and conveys every change in the trail may find a lower, more flexible platform more natural.
Vibram outsole: where the lugs make sense
The Vibram Megagrip outsole with Traction Lug has a stated lug depth of 5 mm. Its tread is designed to provide traction on dirt, stone and wet surfaces, making it suited to routes that mix compact trails with rougher sections.
On the men’s sample, the measured depth was 4.4 mm. The difference from the stated figure does not change the shoe’s general purpose: it is a versatile mountain outsole, not a specialist design for deep mud. On wet rock, grip also depends on the surface and foot placement.
On a run through the Serra Calderona or the mountainous interior of the Valencian Community, for example, the tread makes more sense when loose dirt alternates with rocky stretches than on a compact track with little elevation change. On regular road miles, the lugs add wear without providing the same benefit they do on dirt.
Fit, sizing and upper details
The synthetic upper has TPU reinforcements to hold the foot and protect exposed areas. It also has attachment points for gaiters, which can help reduce the entry of dirt and small stones when compatible accessories are used.
The construction is breathable and does not have a waterproof membrane. That helps ventilation, but water can enter when crossing wet ground or running in rain. Reflective details help with visibility in low light, although they do not replace proper lighting in the mountains.
Sizing deserves attention before purchase: the foot needs room in front of the toes without the heel sliding on descents. Measuring both feet and comparing their length with Hoka’s size chart is more reliable than automatically transferring a size from another brand. Trying the fit with usual trail socks can also help reveal pressure over the instep or movement inside the shoe.
The long laces and short tongue are details that can affect fit. Loose lace ends should be secured without compromising the fastening; tongue comfort depends on the shape of the instep and how the lacing pressure is distributed.
Distance, runner weight and foot strike
The model is intended for a neutral foot strike and offers a structured platform without a dedicated pronation-control system. The stability provided by the construction is not the same as individual correction: runners who use orthotics or have specific support needs should assess the available room with them in place.
There is no single body weight that determines whether the shoe is suitable. A lighter runner may prefer a protective base for many hours in the mountains, while a heavier runner may want a different feel or fit. The route and fit comfort are more useful criteria than a fixed weight range.
For a long mountain run or an ultra, the combination of cushioning, support and lugs has a clear purpose. It can also be used for a short, fast race, but its 286-gram reference weight and structure do not aim for the light feel of a more minimalist racing model.
Durability and care
The rubber coverage is not complete: some areas of midsole are exposed between outsole sections. This helps explain part of the trade-off between protection and weight, although the surface appearance of the foam alone is not enough to decide that the shoe has reached the end of its life.
In an abrasion test, the men’s sample lost 0.5 mm of outsole, compared with an average of 0.9 mm. That is a laboratory result under specific conditions, not a mileage guarantee: abrasive rock, road running and individual foot strike all affect actual wear.
After a muddy outing, removing dirt and letting the shoes air-dry makes it easier to inspect the fabric, lugs and joins. Pay more attention to uneven tread loss, separation or a marked change in comfort than to a universal mileage figure.
Price and choosing against the previous Mafate
The launch price is around €190, placing it at the high end of the trail market. Its value depends on intended use: for runners spending hours on demanding trails, the structure and outsole address specific needs; for occasional outings on easy paths, it may be a difficult investment to make full use of.
The previous generation was called the Hoka Mafate Speed 4. The fifth version drops Speed from the name and adopts a dual-density construction, Rocker Integrity support and gaiter attachment points. The name change alone does not prove it is slower: choosing between generations calls for attention to each model’s fit and features.
Choosing an outsole for your usual terrain
Mountain terrain is rarely uniform. One route can move from firm track to loose rock and finish with a damp descent; this is where a secure fit through changes in footing matters. The terrain encountered most often, rather than only the hardest section of a single race, helps determine how much tread and structure is worth carrying each week.
How we put this review together: we have not tested these shoes. We wrote it by reading published lab tests, brand information and runners’ opinions.
Este artículo contiene enlaces de afiliado: si compras a través de ellos, se genera una pequeña comisión sin coste adicional para ti. Más información.

Races4 months agoValencia Half Marathon 2027: date and registration
Reviews and Comparisons4 months agoAsics Gel-Roadmiles 3 for men: review and current price
Races4 months agoValencia Marathon 2026: entry, ballot and course
Reviews and Comparisons4 months agoAsics Gel Sonoma 8 Gore-Tex: complete analysis for trail and rain
Sneakers4 months agoSaucony Endorphin Pro 4: full review and verdict
News5 months agoStrava API 2026: what changes for clubs, challenges and runner apps?
Reviews and Comparisons5 months agoNike Alphafly 3: opinions, sensations, and real key points
Reviews and Comparisons4 months agoUnder Armour running shoes review 2025-2026: models and key features
Sports Equipment4 months agoShoe sizes in cm: a clear guide to getting the right fit for your footwear
Sneakers3 months agoSkechers GO RUN Consistent 2.0 analysis: comfort and limits
News5 months agoValencia Marathon 2026 route: key tips to train and run better
Sneakers4 months agoAdidas Adizero Boston 13 for men: review and verdict









